Code

Title of evidences

Summary

Exh.11-01

MET curricula at different historical periods

MET Department has been established since 2001. After 14 years of development, MET curriculum has also been gradually modified to suit with the modern trends and demands of the society. The program has had more than 240 credits originally, then 180 credits, and now it contains of only 150 credits

Exh.11-02

Detailed syllabi of some courses in 150-credit program structure

The syllabi emphasizes self-learning capability of students and the meaning of skills derived from practice courses

Exh.11-03

Meeting reports of MET Deparment on revising the MET programe

The change has been suggested by faculty members who have directly joined in teaching in the program, and then approved by the Scientific Committees of FME and HCMUTE to put into application

Exh.11-04

Meeting reports of the FME Academic and Scientific Committee on revising the MET programe

All faculty members, with support from FME managers and staff, have contributed significantly into this big step of changing

Exh.11-05

Reports of Talks

Students do have contributions into the changing of the program structure. During their study time, students frequently take part in the Talks with FME and HCMUTE representatives to reflect their dilemmas in course contents, training program and others

Exh.11-06

Survey results of newly graduated students

Graduate students after having been employed may come back to university to receive their bachelor degrees or join in annual alumni meeting. On such occasions, they are invited to share the newest requirements to be added into course contents and program structure

Exh.11-07

Contributing opinions of alumni in course contents and training programe structure

Alumni of FEM are annually invited to share the newest experiences from the factory that is added into course contents and program structure

Exh.11-08

Questionnaire for students, for graduates

In accordance with the feedback of undergraduates and alumni, opinions from employers, companies are also very valuable for FME faculty members to ameliorate the curriculum in order to provide qualified and skilled engineers to the labor market

Exh.11-09

Announcement for meeting between Board of Dean, Board of President with students

The Faculty also collects feedback from students via direct 75 communication between the representatives of the faculty and students each semester

Exh.11-10

Direction ideas from university leaders

The ideas from university leaders are imfortant to improve the MET programe

Exh.11-11

Questionnaire for graduates

The feedbacks are used to improve the MET curricula applied in 2012, 2013 and from 2014 onwards. Annually, it may be modified by up to 7% to update with new knowledge

Exh.11-12

Reports of survey results on graduates over the years

For graduates, they can provide feedback about quality of the whole study program in different levels of their satisfaction. Their feedback is taken into consideration and analyzed by the university and the faculty to improve the program

Exh.11-13

Opinions of employers to MET training programme

The feedback of undergraduates and alumni, opinions from employers, companies are also very valuable for FME faculty members to ameliorate the curriculum in order to provide qualified and skilled engineers to the labor market

Exh. 11-14

Meeting reports of MET Department on revising MET cirricula

These feedbacks are used to improve the MET curricula applied in 2012, 2013 and from 2014 onwards

Exh. 11-15

Meeting reports of the FME Academic and Scientific Committee on revising the MET programme

These feedbacks are used to improve the MET curricula applied in 2012, 2013 and from 2014 onwards

Exh. 11-16

MET cirricula applied in 2012, 2013 and from 2014 onwards

These feedbacks are used to improve the MET curricula applied in 2012, 2013 and from 2014 onwards

Exh. 11-17

Procedures of Reviewing and Revising Curriculum

The HCMUTE has promulgated the Regulation for revising procedure of study program

Exh. 11-18

MET cirricula applied in 2012, 2013 and from 2014 onwards

Annually, it may be modified by up to 7% to update with new knowledge

Exh. 11-19

Through Quality Assurance Office and the website http://online.hcmute.edu.vn,

students can easily reflect quality performance of lecturers

Exh. 11-20

Reports of Talks

Students do have contributions into the changing of the programme structure. During their study time, students frequently take part in the Talks with FME and HCMUTE representatives to reflect their dilemmas in course contents, study program and others

Exh. 11-21

Conclusions and new tasks to fulfill students' requests from University president

The students can directly request their needs to University President in the Talks with HCMUTE and FME managers for the timeliest correction

Exh. 11-22

Survey form for students' evaluation on lecturers' performance

At the end of every semester, students are required to evaluate lecturers' performance through the website http://online.hcmute.edu.vn

Exh. 11-23

Report of students' evaluation on lecturers' teaching performance

Survey results are summarized and processed by Quality Assurance Office and then sent back to FME

Exh. 11-24

Regulation for lecturers' teaching quality improvement

The lecturers receiving low satisfaction (less than 72%) will have to explain and propose the solutions to FME managing board to improve their teaching quality

Exh. 11-25

Course contents and training programme structure modification basing on stakeholders' feedback

Additionally, through meetings with alumni, companies, employers, department and faculty members, FME always asks for their opinions on the current study program and course contents to know if it still works well with students' future work. Any necessary modification will be made with the approval of FME academic and scientific committee every year

Exh. 11-26

Functions and Responsibilities of Quality Assurance Office

Quality Assurance Office advises the university Presidential board of tasks to ensure the education quality of the university which must follow tightly the MoET regulation; to establish and implement the self-evaluation process for quality assurance with a pre-planned schedule

Exh. 11-27

Lecturers' registration for online teaching

In order to ensure the learning and teaching quality, improvement of teaching methodology is very much necessary. Lecturers have to register for online teaching courses and apply hybrid learning

Exh. 11-28

Lecturers' registration for delivering courses in English or biligual courses

The information and media technology into lectures with Powerpoint slides, videos, etc, and deliver courses in

English or bilingual courses to simultaneously enhance students' English proficiency

Exh. 11-29

Regulation for Young lecturer probation

Young lecturers have to take one probationary year for teaching experience before being allowed to officially deliver lectures for the department

Exh. 11-30

Plan for Conference on Investigation & Assessment Amelioration

FME has held conferences on Investigation & Assessment Amelioration

Exh. 11-31

Images and presented reports in the Conference on Investigation & Assessment Amelioration

Assessment methods do contribute to the fairness and output quality of teaching and learning activities. Since 2012, formative assessment results have been increased from 20% or 30% to 50% in all the courses to evaluate more precisely the whole learning process of students and their self-learning activeness. In order to find out the most suitable assessment methods for every course to affect positively on students' learning capability, MET department and FME do assessment experience sharing among lecturers in MET department or FME; take opinions, proposes from colleagues and students on formative and summative assessments to improve the process.

Exh. 11-32

List of courses ameliorated in Investigation & Assessment

From that conference time on, FME and all of its departments intend to encourage their lecturers to use open-examination (material usage allowed), which is a method to stimulate students' innovation and avoid students' self-limited review or simple learn-by-heart

Exh. 11-33

Functions and Responsiblities of Academic Inspectorate Office

The teaching quality is controlled by FME, Academic Inspectorate Office and OAA

Exh. 11-34

Teaching visiting lists, Reports for teaching recommendation

FME appointed a vice dean to be responsible for the teaching operation and quality assurance. He or she as well as departments make plans of participating in teachers’ classes every semester to recommend their teaching improvement

Exh. 11-35

Report of changes according to students' online feedback

The students' online feedback at the end of each course through http://online.hcmute.edu.vn do help these units to make timely improvement for the teaching quality